See the original on the masterpath website titled
"Sri Gary Olsen Responds to Internet Criticism About MasterPath"
Here is my rebuttal paragraph by paragraph of his statements, I didn't cut and past the whole page, as there was some additional info at the top that wasn't relevant to criticisms that I have personally made about the MP. Enjoy !
Sri Gary Olsen Responds to Internet Criticism About MasterPath
Q. There is a public forum on the Internet wherein two or three former MasterPath students are engaging in a rather hostile attack on you, the MasterPath, and the MasterPath students. Are these accusations and criticisms truthful?
A. No, these accusations are definitely not truthful, and there is actually a wealth of misinformation and false charges being manufactured and projected on this forum. To put this into proper perspective, I must state that out of the thousands of students I have initiated, only this small number have taken such a stance. Thus, rather than diminishing the MasterPath doctrine, this truth actually reflects and gives testimony to the tremendously high success rate of those embracing this Teaching. Even though this forum embodies a barrage of false accusations along with an attempt to demean the Master and invalidate the Path, I maintain that every experience within the divine creation, regardless of how retrogressive it may initially appear, will eventually reveal an intended purpose that holds essential value for the experiencer. The predominant vibration of anger projected in this forum leaves little question as to why these former students found it difficult to harmonize with the spiritual objectives of MasterPath, but nonetheless, all individuals have the right to their own opinion, and these former students and their associates are free to express themselves in any way they choose.
RESPONSE to 1st paragraph: What false charges? They are not stated as to what those false charges are; hence this reaction is just a refusal to address issues by former MPs to be pointed out as simply meaningless falsehoods and without foundation. A dismissive attitude at best on the part of Gary. What is not mentioned about the vibration of anger or the anger itself, and even rage in some cases, is that it very well may be justified and valid in that boundaries were violated, people were being taken advantage of, $$$s taken from them under false pretense, being lied to and misled into something that did not provide the experience that was proselytized and did not match the format of what a truly devoted chela should experience. Jeez thanks Gary for allowing us the freedom to express ourselves as we have a right to do under the US constitution, yes and that was sarcasm, more on the sarcasm thing later on.
With all of the false information out there today, this does, however, present a bit of a quandary for sincere seekers, leaving them to ask, How am I supposed to discern whether negative allegations against a spiritual path are true or false? Truthfully speaking, those who take up arms against any specific belief system typically have a personal motive for attempting to adversely influence or even outright deny others their own inherent right to spiritual freedom. When an individual is representing a truly spiritual point of view, ones vibration, tone, and demeanor accurately reflect this underlying intent, and even a negative assessment will be communicated in a balanced, loving, and progressive manner. And likewise, when a message is colored and imbued with injurious intent, this too directly reveals the original motive and attitude through which it has been expressed. Therefore, if a seeker can perceive the predominant tone and vibration behind any statement, this will easily reveal whether the individuals expressed criticism holds either a destructive or constructive purpose. If the vibration is perceived to be destructive, this is the surefire indication that truth is receding from you. On the other hand, if the motive is intuited as constructive, the chances are far better that truth resides in this direction.
RESPONSE to 2nd paragraph: Gary is correct some of us have taken up arms against the MP, and for good reason since we do not wish to see it perpetuate its brand of dysfunction being promulgated onto others, particularly since many of us have seen the damage that it has caused in peoples lives, from a first person standpoint as well as from a familial impact standpoint (families disintegrating, divorce, and even murder). There is no denying of anothers right to spiritual freedom on the part of the MP Dissenters, there is only a relaying of experience that they had whilst on the MP. It is also not unreasonable to see conclusions being drawn as to potentially why someone would set up such an experience for people, in attempt to determine an underlying motive of people who would do such a thing. (Please see the city-data forum on the MP and Gary Olsen).
As to whether it is constructive or destructive, for those who do understand that when they come upon a dangerous meme as this MP, that it deserves to be eradicated since it has been clearly demonstrated that even long time MPs left because of severely dysfunctional behavior, that was at times verbally, mentally, emotionally and spiritually abusive was displayed by Gary Olsen on numerous occasions (again see the city-data thread). So consider it destructive if you will, but that is also ordained by God as well, since God hates pretenders to his throne. And this effort on the part of the MP Dissenters may very well be the thing that is needed to undo the damage that has been caused, and that would be in Love. Because something is destructive does not mean it is not truthful at all, to wit, use the example of the American colonists throwing off the mantle of mother England, or how about the French throwing off the monarchy. The argument of the expression of anger not having a place emotionally or spiritually in ones life, particularly when faced with a # of paradoxes that simply DO NOT add up regarding the MP is not an accurate or fair representation of how things are on the MP. Nor does it mean that truth is receding from one either, it simply means that some issue has been brought up and needs to be addressed. Anger is normal human emotion, and whilst it can be argued it is not the most constructive of emotions, even Gary has suggested its use, if just feigned. But again the city-data thread points out instances when it was not feigned, and was expressed directly by Gary Olsen and with emotional intent when the message was delivered, and as it was received by those in attendance.
Another infallible litmus test is the absence or presence of love, truth, and good will. The principle of love is so expansive that even truth, when not spoken in love, is no truth at all. Love and truth go hand in hand, and they cease to exist within an atmosphere of retrogressive tendencies or the presence of destructive motives. Likewise, in a spiritual atmosphere, love, truth, and good will naturally flourish, giving one an undeniable sense of an expanded consciousness and an infusion of constructive spiritual insights.
RESPONSE to 3rd paragraph: Some of us who were on the MP, have seen the use of love bombs, where people who are new to the MP, are approached in a loving manner so as to not frighten them away from this organization. But that euphoria wears off after one has attended more than a few chela meetings, and the rubber hits the road of reality in that the purposefully obfuscated MP teachings are meant to confuse a person so as to NOT be able to get a clear take on what one would really get from the MP. So people who are investigating the MP are then by default left to hear the braying of current chelas on how great the Master is, and how infallible he is, and that he just loves everyone. Truth, well that is a rather convenient word to use, but a truth, unless it is based on an actual provable fact, is nothing more than a belief wrapped in denial. And that is why they call it a faith. For those who have experienced this loss of faith regarding the MP, it would only be fair that people who are investigating the MP would want to see, hear and know the other side of what the MP professes to say that it is about. Just like any other religion or cult.