We are all that individual. It's a matter of mind. Like human intuition.
The question is superfluous.
Which question?
Eta: Apologies, I'm multitasking. I think I understand what you mean.
I agree, 100%. That's why there is no good reason to take offense at what I wrote. Everyone's perception, especially vision, including myself is being shaped by expectations and anticipation. Yes. But, this does not prohibit objective fact. Do you agree?
As I mentioned, the darmic practitioners report there is an opportunity for clear perception. I do not practice that religion, instead I do it the hard way. My conclusions are developed from research and case-by-case evaluation. When I do that, the Palestinian stories told by Hamas and parroted by their allies are overwhelmingly false and the state of Israel is doing the right thing.
Those who are opposed to Israel and are pro-palestinian ( including my fellow Jews ) do not use facts or case-by-case evaluation to develop their conclusions. They rely on emotive arguments telling sob stories and demonizing those who disagree.
A rational fact based argument always defeats the emotive plea when they are in opposition. Certain facts are indisputable. For example: few are aware or keep in mind that the Palestinians sold their land to the Jewish immigrants who later became the State of Israel. Then, after taking their money, they attacked attempting to reclaim the land which was legally sold. In fact the land sales are still occuring. Palestinians are still selling their land. But Hamas and their allies continue to lie claiming the land is stolen.
Another example is the "settler" issue. Few are aware or keep in mind that the prohibition on development of "Area C" in the West Bank is conditional. The 2nd Oslo accords designated that land as Palestine if, Big If, Palestine ceased their unjust war against Israel. Palestine broke their treaty again. Area C is no longer protected as a direct consequence of Palestine breaking the truce.
All of this is verifiable objective fact.
