Jaymes
The cake is a lie
I can't emphasize enough how disgusting I find the behavior of "it's okay as long as I find it hot."Kowalski said:I don't girls getting on together, but guys, ugh, that's just sick, really sick and gross.
Cheers
K
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
I can't emphasize enough how disgusting I find the behavior of "it's okay as long as I find it hot."Kowalski said:I don't girls getting on together, but guys, ugh, that's just sick, really sick and gross.
Cheers
K
Sexual perferrence! I believe it is a choice not a cause!Maize said:
Then how come none of the rest of my 5 siblings are gay? I mean, we were in the exact same environment, and very sheltered. No (out) gay family members to speak of. In fact, I really didn't know what "homosexual" meant until I was in high school, (although thanks to the church I grew up in I knew that is was one of the worst things you could ever be called).
Something tells me your suggestion is fast headed for the graveyard of untried ideas.Ardent Listener said:Thanks to modern science, there is a cure for homosexuality. If two people of the same sex really love each other so very much, why don't one of them have a sex change? Then they can be normal like the rest of us!
:tsk: :bonk: :woohoo: :tsk:
You are probably right. It's a great idea, but the guy on the tax debate would have to pay for all the medical costs for the gays. Back to the drawing board.:sarcasticSunstone said:Something tells me your suggestion is fast headed for the graveyard of untried ideas.
So it's a matter of belief? If that's the case, why is one belief supposed to be right, and the other wrong?nonda said:Sexual perferrence! I believe it is a choice not a cause!
Good question, Feathers!FeathersinHair said:So it's a matter of belief? If that's the case, why is one belief supposed to be right, and the other wrong?
Ah, crap! :biglaugh: It won't let me frubal you twice, but you have my frubals in spirit for that one (and I agree!!). :biglaugh:FeathersinHair said:He also taught that all women secretly desire to have dangly bits. I really, really don't.
Rick123123 said:Those of you people out there who say God is all there is or God has all power, and yet still condemn gays... this is a contradiction if God is all there is then God must be gays and if God has all power he would put a stop to the people being gay.
Joeboonda said:But, when God created everything, he said it was good, so after the fall, things began to change, animals and humans too, but I ramble.
See Feathers' comment about dangly bits above: that's my response to your proposed "cure". You'll find I'm not the lone ranger there.Ardent Listener said:Thanks to modern science, there is a cure for homosexuality. If two people of the same sex really love each other so very much, why don't one of them have a sex change? Then they can be normal like the rest of us!
Well that's your problem. My problem is human nature, which means things are never balanced, I think it's rather naive to not accept that humansare the most biased creatures you could imgaine.Jensa said:I can't emphasize enough how disgusting I find the behavior of "it's okay as long as I find it hot."
I'm not sure about that, Feathers. Cows may be sacred so they don't eat them, but it apparently does not mean they have to take care of them either. I've read articles and watched tv documentaries on India (I think) where the cows are diseased and starving because nobody takes care of them. Which is worse, to have your diseases treated and be fed even though your life is short....or to have a longer life but be miserable because you're starving and full of blowfly larva?FeathersinHair said:Cows should be given all the options! (I've got a sneaking suspicion most would turn out to be Hindu. I wonder why that is...:sarcastic )
That actually is understandable. It has been explained that psychologically, a man understands loving a woman, sothe idea of a woman loving another woman is much more acceptable that that of two men together.Kowalski said:I don't girls getting on together, but guys, ugh, that's just sick, really sick and gross.
Cheers
K
Yes Jensa, I agree with you completely. But there we are, some people cannot (or maybe will not) help themselves.Jensa said:I can't emphasize enough how disgusting I find the behavior of "it's okay as long as I find it hot."
I couldn't agree with you more Ch'ang - but the bible does not condemn the homosexuals per se; besides which, at the end of the day, it is between the homosexual and God - I don't believe anyone else's views have any relevency whatsoever. But some people, it seems, love poking their noses.........ch'ang said:Why does it matter if it is natural if people want to be homosexual then let you have no right to condemn them just because the bible says so
'Normal' is very relative indeed; you might point out to our friend that, from your point of view of normality, and from the point of all of your kind, he is the one who is abnormal. makes you think...Bastet said:See Feathers' comment about dangly bits above: that's my response to your proposed "cure". You'll find I'm not the lone ranger there.
BTW, "normal" is a very relative term. Very.
No it isn't; just about everyone else here has no problem. The problem sits well and truly with you.Kowalski said:Well that's your problem. My problem is human nature, which means things are never balanced, I think it's rather naive to not accept that humansare the most biased creatures you could imgaine.
K