Evil is the term we use to separate ourselves from those who do things we don't want them to do. By labeling something 'evil' we can safely treat them like rabid animals that bear no resemblance to us 'good' people. Its like a social defense mechanism. My long absent two cents. ;)
I can't help but notice you didn't answer my questions. Not that I'm incredibly shocked. They were designed to illustrate your complete lack of ability to say what you are saying (that it's impossible) due to a lack of effort on your part. Your refusal to answer only galvanizes my assumption...
How hard have you tried? Was that as hard as you could have tried? Do you suspect that you are the person that tries the hardest?
I suggest you speak for yourself as opposed to lumping the rest of us in with your failure to achieve fairness for everybody.
You and me and everyone else...
You can't take the trouble out of humans. Certainly not by removing religion.
Do you have a list?
I think you are wrong. Religion is a product of humans, as you said. Religion is expression. People that are bad do bad things. Sometimes those people are part of a religion.
The same happens...
In Doom 2 there are a bunch of zombies. They die in droves. I wonder what they might say about their designer? Would they think he made them incorrectly? Would they shout, "Why do we always die, John Romero (creator of Doom)? Why must we be blown to tiny bits by this anonymous masked man with...
You should read more threads.
That's good, but something tells me you'll start speaking for the rest of us any minute now...
I'd be willing to bet you believe one or two things at least that have nothing to do with facts or reality.
No.
Oh... so much for speaking for yourself... told...
I was a founding member of the Order of the Bloody Chainsaw. I was knighted by a dark haired fella named Ashley. Hail to the king, baby.
All zombies get the axe.
It sort of defies the concept to have more than one. If omnipotence is subject to any limitations at all, it isn't really omnipotence in the literal sense. Considering what a monstrous limitation another omnipotent being would be, I have to say that would pretty much eliminate it altogether. Not...
It doesn't make sense to me. I understand the sentiment, of course, but the idea seems to make God there for us, instead of the other way around. If I am to accept a divine creator (which I do) then I have to imagine that it created life for its own ends. Not for ours. I can't say for sure if...