I meant Sandra Day O'Connor, the first woman.If "RBG" means Ruth Bader Ginsburg, then Clinton nominated her for the Supreme Court, not Reagan.
I need to stop doing hit and run posts.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
I meant Sandra Day O'Connor, the first woman.If "RBG" means Ruth Bader Ginsburg, then Clinton nominated her for the Supreme Court, not Reagan.
I have a slight automatic preference for whites over blacks.
The test is "stupid" in that it was criticised for not being very scientific. One shouldn't take it too serious. The only thing that it's good for is to show that we do have unconscious biases. Being aware of that helps to overcome those biases.
OkSee the wonderful play "M Butterfly" by David Henry Hwung
I mean it -- it really is good. And you, possibly more than any other member here, will get a lot of it.
I know guys like that.
But they're all Asian.
(Must marry someone acceptable.)
But at least they don't say "oriental".
So, so right! I think of all the protests over the "Oriental" or "Arabic" dances from Tchaikovsky's Nutcracker. And Disney did a beautiful job of the former in "Fantasia."At least up until the 1990s, the word "Oriental" was considered acceptable, and then, suddenly that stopped. Then, "Asian" became the preferred term to use. We could have always used "Occidental" instead of "Westerner."
Of course, I've heard some even more derogatory terms used for just about every race and ethnicity out there. And I'm sure they exist in every language, too.
Sometimes I wonder if the push towards sanitizing the language like that might have had the opposite effect of what was intended.
I mean it -- it really is good. And you, possibly more than any other member here, will get a lot of it.
Think about Puccini's opera Madama Butterfly. Well, in this, a real Chinese person (we presume a woman) talks about how a Japanese girl falls for an American -- and how the west sees itself in relation to the orient. Here's a wonderful speech from the play:
"Consider it this way: what would you say if a blonde homecoming queen fell in love with a short Japanese businessman? He treats her cruelly, then goes home for three years, during which time she prays to his picture and turns down marriage from a young Kennedy. Then, when she learns he has remarried, she kills herself. Now, I believe you would consider this girl to be a deranged idiot, correct? But because it’s an Oriental who kills herself for a Westerner—ah!—you find it beautiful."
As you wish....Maybe i will skip that
And Suzie Wong
Sounds very skip-worthy.Maybe i will skip that
So, so right! I think of all the protests over the "Oriental" or "Arabic" dances from Tchaikovsky's Nutcracker. And Disney did a beautiful job of the former in "Fantasia."
Again, look at Harper Lee's "To Kill a Mockingbird." The "N" word is used frequently in it, and we have to know that -- and see it and hear it -- to know just how powerful a suppressor of both the rights of some and the conscience of others depended on it.
I absolutely hate our modern tendency to try to suppress words -- even the most offensive ones. We need to confront them, up-front, boldly, see them for what they are, talk about them because otherwise how can we agree just how cruel and repressive they were?
Reading history means reading it as it happened -- not as we would like it to have happened. If we do that, we learn nothing at all.
It has become a tool for gatekeeping by the (mostly white) "woke" crowd, to be able to remember what you are allowed to callOne thing I'll say about the 1970s is that it was truly a time when people would "let it all hang out," to use the slang of the decade. It was when a lot of these issues (and words) were confronted and openly discussed. It wasn't really until the 80s and 90s that there was this push to sanitize everything.
Just let someone try to call me aIt has become a tool for gatekeeping by the (mostly white) "woke" crowd, to be able to remember what you are allowed to callmoorsnegroesblackscoloured peoplepeople of colourAfrican Americans this week.
Honestly, there's many people who fetishize those of certain ethnicities, and it comes from racist stereotypes. I've met multiple women and a man who had a racist sexual fetish for black men (and it's formed its own nasty subculture), and it's totally gross and dehumanizing. It happens with other racial and sexual combinations, too. People are certainly capable of having sex with people they don't view as equals or fully human.
Then theres kind of an extreme oppositeAnd it still takes tolerance of the other parson to let them into your body, equal or not
Then theres kind of an extreme opposite
Allow, no.Is there? Would you? Would I? Would anyone you know?
Would any "normal" woman (or man) allow someone they consider loathsome into their body?
It has become a tool for gatekeeping by the (mostly white) "woke" crowd, to be able to remember what you are allowed to callmoorsnegroesblackscoloured peoplepeople of colourAfrican Americans this week.
In Hong Kong, you'd be just a womanJust let someone try to call me a
" woman of colour "
In Hong Kong, you'd be just a womanof color.
It's similar to how you don't eat "Chinese food"...it's just "food" to you.
Every now & then, we'll hear some announcer or other
talking head refer to a someone from another country
as "African American" just cuz they're black. It's the
only acceptable way to say "black" to many these days.
Bruno knows about the African Americans in Africa....
Every now & then, we'll hear some announcer or other
talking head refer to a someone from another country
as "African American" just cuz they're black. It's the
only acceptable way for many woke folk to say "black"
these days.