I am a small bit concerned that our governments, in protecting 'freedom of speech', will increasingly restrict our freedom. Off the top of my head I'm thinking along the lines of increased government surveillance, requirements for passports to travel within Europe etc
Given that the vast majority of those murdered by Isis and their ilk are Muslims, the idea that the victims should be responsible for the crimes of the perpetrators is nuts.
Jay is right - Murdoch is an ***.
I don't think anyone in Europe gives a hoot about Islam.
Vulnerable, apparently mentally ill, misguided individuals murdering defenseless victims is a different matter.
Cartoons, printed in Iran, denying the holocaust were published in Israel. What does that tell you?
Iranian cartoons mock Holocaust | The Times of Israel
I have no problem with the idea of respect. My problem is a practical one - who gets do decide what ideas are deserving of respect. On balance I think it best to allow people express themselves and let ideas stand or fall on their own merits without the protection of the law. On the other...
Just so. However, given the context that speech in Europe may not be that free and regarding the murders in Paris - I am not sure that the killers are attacking something as obscure as 'free speech'. Is it reasonable to consider them as anything other than irrational murderous headbangers...
I'm not sure that speech in much of Europe is that free.
Holocaust denial is rightly illegal. Hate speech is illegal. Ireland has Blasphemy laws. In one Irish case a radio journalist was recently censured because he expressed support for gay marriage.
I don't think mind and its contents can be separated. I am a construct of my mind. I wholly accept that one can get lost in a mystical moment but by definition that mystical moment when one is in some sense absent or fallen away can never be 'mine' because 'I' was not there.
I can never get...